Jury says Meta must pay $375 million for endangering children online
The state of New Mexico alleged that Facebook’s algorithms and lack of protections for young users put them at risk of harms including sexual abuse.
March 24, 2026 at 7:14 p.m. EDT
A recording of Mark Zuckerberg’s deposition is played for jurors this month in Santa Fe. (Jim Weber/Santa Fe New Mexican/Pool/AP)
By Ian Duncan
A jury in New Mexico sided with the state attorney general’s office in a landmark case accusing social media giant Meta of allowing its social media platforms to become venues for child predators to solicit young users.
Get concise answers to your questions. Try Ask The Post AI.
The jury ordered Meta to pay $375 million for violations of the state’s consumer protection laws in its verdict, delivered Tuesday afternoon.
“The jury’s verdict is a historic victory for every child and family who has paid the price for Meta’s choice to put profits over kids’ safety,” New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez, a Democrat, said in a statement.
“Meta executives knew their products harmed children, disregarded warnings from their own employees, and lied to the public about what they knew,” he added. “Today the jury joined families, educators, and child safety experts in saying enough is enough.”
💻
Investigators from the New Mexico Department of Justice went undercover on Facebook in an effort to gather evidence on the effects of the site’s algorithms and alleged lack of protections for young users. Over a multi-week trial in Santa Fe, they presented allegations that Meta broke state laws, arguing that young Meta users were at risk of being exposed to sexual abuse images or messages from would-be predators.
“Meta’s platforms Facebook and Instagram are a breeding ground for predators,” the state alleged in a court filing.
The state’s probe also resulted in criminal charges against three men. They included one who had previously been banned from Facebook for being a convicted sex offender, but who authorities alleged returned to the site and began an inappropriate chat with an 11-year-old girl before being caught in a sting operation.
Meta said immediately after Tuesday’s verdict that it would appeal.
“We work hard to keep people safe on our platforms and are clear about the challenges of identifying and removing bad actors or harmful content,” Meta spokesman Chris Sgro said in an email. “We will continue to defend ourselves vigorously, and we remain confident in our record of protecting teens online.”
The verdict is a rare courtroom victory for plaintiffs trying to hold the tech industry accountable for activity on online platforms in the face of broad legal protections it has enjoyed since the 1990s. Mary Graw Leary, a law professor at Catholic University, said the result is significant because it shows that those shields are not impenetrable.
“When companies operate in that kind of a world, they choose profit over children and safety because they have no incentive to do otherwise,” Graw Leary said in an email. “This verdict signals that tech can be held accountable for these business decisions, which may change their incentives.”
Related Articles
Blowback over Charlie Kirk posts prompts employers’ social media crackdown
Social media addiction’s surprising challenger? Anti-doomscrolling influenc…
Justice Dept. restricts employees’ social media posts
How one viral trend created the internet as we know it
Social media platforms removed 4.7 million accounts after Australia banned ..
She blew the whistle at Meta. Then her career fell apart.
Some of the most coveted jobs in America aren’t safe anymore
Why one of the nation’s most prosperous industries is shedding jobs
Big Tech bet on Trump. It’s still waiting for the payoff.
Meta and other companies are now facing several cases alleging that their platforms are harmful to children and teens. The cases have worked around the companies’ legal protections by focusing on product design choices.
The New Mexico verdict comes as a separate jury in Los Angeles is weighing a case in which a young social media user alleged that she had become addicted to Instagram and YouTube.
A separate trial in the New Mexico case is scheduled for May, when the state will try to persuade a judge to impose further financial penalties and order changes to the design of Meta’s platforms to improve child safety.
Torrez wrote to Meta chief executive Mark Zuckerberg in December, asking for changes including age verification, reduction of risks created by encrypted chat features, changes to algorithms and the removal of “bad actors.”
While the trial was underway, Meta said it would end fully encrypted chats on Instagram, shutting down a privacy feature that law enforcement has argued makes it harder to uncover wrongdoing.
What readers are saying
The comments reflect a strong sentiment against Meta and its handling of children’s safety online, with many expressing satisfaction over the $375 million fine imposed by a jury. Some suggest that the penalty is insufficient and call for more significant consequences, while… Show more
This summary is AI-generated. AI can make mistakes and this summary is not a replacement for reading the comments.
View this Washington Post article CLICK HERE
Media Air Base, LLC 
Leave a comment